<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Believe the Ethanol Hype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openmarket.org/2007/07/31/dont-believe-the-ethanol-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/07/31/dont-believe-the-ethanol-hype/</link>
	<description>The Competitive Enterprise Institute Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Steenblik (Global Subsidies Initiative)</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/07/31/dont-believe-the-ethanol-hype/#comment-36402</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Steenblik (Global Subsidies Initiative)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/07/31/dont-believe-the-ethanol-hype/#comment-36402</guid>
		<description>Well said, Stan. And here is a link to the study mentioned in the Rolling Stone article. The GSI is a program under the IISD, by the way:

http://www.globalsubsidies.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Stan. And here is a link to the study mentioned in the Rolling Stone article. The GSI is a program under the IISD, by the way:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.globalsubsidies.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalsubsidies.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Cotton</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/07/31/dont-believe-the-ethanol-hype/#comment-36299</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Cotton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/07/31/dont-believe-the-ethanol-hype/#comment-36299</guid>
		<description>How about a Cane Mutiny to take on the agri-biz propaganda mill.

The back room boys want you to believe billions in tax-payer subsidies is achieving energy independence, It’s not. The fixers want you to believe that a 54 cents a gallon tax on imported sugar cane ethanol is helping farmers. How’s that helping farmers? They sell all the ethanol they can make now, and it’s not enough and they pocket a 51 cents per gallon subsidy to boot. All that ethanol tariff does is stop motorists from buying cheap, renewable ethanol from our best friends.

If it was just greed, that’s one thing. Keeping an affordable, clean renewable energy source like cane ethanol out of consumers’ gas tanks is unpatriotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a Cane Mutiny to take on the agri-biz propaganda mill.</p>
<p>The back room boys want you to believe billions in tax-payer subsidies is achieving energy independence, It’s not. The fixers want you to believe that a 54 cents a gallon tax on imported sugar cane ethanol is helping farmers. How’s that helping farmers? They sell all the ethanol they can make now, and it’s not enough and they pocket a 51 cents per gallon subsidy to boot. All that ethanol tariff does is stop motorists from buying cheap, renewable ethanol from our best friends.</p>
<p>If it was just greed, that’s one thing. Keeping an affordable, clean renewable energy source like cane ethanol out of consumers’ gas tanks is unpatriotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
