A committee selected by Norway’s socialist legislature has awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Its criteria obviously don’t include a concern for accuracy or truth, or Gore wouldn’t have been a co-recipient of the Prize.
An English judge previously ruled that Gore’s book is partisan, biased, and contains many factual errors, even though he shared Gore’s belief that man is causing global warming.
Yet Gore has received a Nobel Prize for a book (and film) that even sympathizers can see is filled with factual errors. Gore’s book and film are so tendentious and inaccurate that they do little to advance his position.
Reactions to his receiving the prize can be found here and here. Even some who voted for Gore think it is ridiculous. Bjorn Lomborg comments on how odd it was to include Gore along with reputable scientists as a recipient of the prize.
It seems like a clumsy effort by Norway’s socialist government to meddle in domestic American politics by giving a boost to a left-of-center politician whose views are more in sync with Scandinavian socialism.
But compared to other recent actions by the Norwegian government — like its awful decision to levy massive retroactive tax increases that effectively expropriate the country’s shipping industry — it is relatively harmless.
The Norwegians’ past decision to give a Nobel Prize to Jimmy Carter, which was a poorly-veiled attempt to sway American voters in favor of John Kerry and against George Bush, failed to achieve its objective. Similarly, giving Al Gore the prize will not likely have any lasting effect on American politics.
It will, however, give Gore one more excuse to fly across Europe in his private jet on one junket after another, emitting copious amounts of greenhouse gases while delivering sanctimonious harangues about climate change.
{ 2 comments }
What a crock. Yet another conservative who disagrees with the potential of spreading the information that everyone needs to know when it comes to global warming. Granted that the effects of our impact on the environment may not come to fruition for another two to three hundred years we must be proactive so future generations don't have to suffer due to our inaction. Yes carbon dioxide levels might have been higher (in one or two distinct years) before pre-industrial levels but we are looking at the change as a whole over the past fifty years. I love how you so-called "scientists" like to use the facts to debunk what someone else is trying to convey. Just like evolution "which is a fact based upon the evidence collected" you still have no idea of what you are speaking of. Jimmy Carter received his prize due to his (and the Carter Center's) efforts to find peaceful solutions to conflict in many other countries that don't share the same luxuries as we do. They have assisted in the virtual eradication of small pox and the guinea worm and you don't think that is a good enough contribution to the world arena? His prize had little to do with the election. Enjoy your espresso in your wealthy-only (more likely whites only) country club (with Ann Coulter) and stay out of the realm of trying to sound magnanimous so you can try to trick people into thinking you are a good person. I bet you even think that the Holocaust didn't happen. People like you remind me of how thankful I can be that I was raised by good parents who taught me to have a mind of my own and look at all of the evidence presented on a subject and to make my own conclusions.
The conservatives would like for both sides to be studied – if there is indeed a problem, it should be addressed – but don't massively disrupt the economy -indeed society and the world – to try to fix a problem that might be due to solor radience or changes in earth orbit – remember that 30 years ago we were being cautioned about the coming ice age – I would rather see science done by the scientific method rather than the Chicken Little method, which is the way Algore approaches it. For a thorough analysis oc Chicken Little's [sory, Algore's] Inconvenient "Truth", see http://www.cei.org/pages/ait_response.cfm. The scientific world, despite misrepresentations by Al Gore is not monolithic, although the global warming thought police would like it to be. Remember Al's previous credibility probles [he invented the internet, he and Tipper were the inspiration for "Love Story" - now he has the same prize awarded to Jimmy [I saw a UFO] Carter and Yassir Arafat.
Comments on this entry are closed.