<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Reviews $2.5 Billion Punitive Damage Award Against Exxon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openmarket.org/2007/10/31/supreme-court-reviews-25-billion-punitive-damage-award-against-exxon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/10/31/supreme-court-reviews-25-billion-punitive-damage-award-against-exxon/</link>
	<description>The Competitive Enterprise Institute Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: $2.5 Billion Punitive Damages Against Exxon Cut to $507 Million &#124; OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/10/31/supreme-court-reviews-25-billion-punitive-damage-award-against-exxon/#comment-54224</link>
		<dc:creator>$2.5 Billion Punitive Damages Against Exxon Cut to $507 Million &#124; OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/10/31/supreme-court-reviews-25-billion-punitive-damage-award-against-exxon/#comment-54224</guid>
		<description>[...] was a strong argument that no punitive damages were justified at all against Exxon, under traditional principles of maritime law, but the justices divided equally on whether any [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a strong argument that no punitive damages were justified at all against Exxon, under traditional principles of maritime law, but the justices divided equally on whether any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $2.5 Billion Punitive Damage Award Under Supreme Court Review &#124; OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/10/31/supreme-court-reviews-25-billion-punitive-damage-award-against-exxon/#comment-40672</link>
		<dc:creator>$2.5 Billion Punitive Damage Award Under Supreme Court Review &#124; OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/10/31/supreme-court-reviews-25-billion-punitive-damage-award-against-exxon/#comment-40672</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote about Exxon&#8217;s challenge to a $2.5 billion punitive damage award against it (in the Exxon Valdez oil spill case) that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote about Exxon&#8217;s challenge to a $2.5 billion punitive damage award against it (in the Exxon Valdez oil spill case) that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
