GOP Big Spenders, But I Repeat Myself
Finally, after nearly seven years of approving every big spending bill to hit his desk, President George W. Bush is occasionally saying no to budget bloat. And now the Republicans in Congress appear ready to prove that they, no less than their Democratic brethren, really like spending other people’s money.
Reports Robert Bluey of the Heritage Foundation:
Congressional Republicans have tried hard this year to reclaim the GOP’s traditional “brand” as the party of fiscal responsibility. They’re about to face a test that will show whether their rhetoric matches reality.
President Bush’s veto of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) on Friday puts him at odds with a majority of Republicans on Capitol Hill. And unlike other legislation that Bush has sent back to Congress, the president actually faces the prospect of having a bipartisan majority throw his veto back in his face.
Only in Washington can lawmakers sit down to negotiate two bills with price tags of $14 billion and $15 billion and come up with a “compromise” costing $23 billion. Washington Examiner columnist Tim Carney recently wrote that “this bill’s growth behind closed doors certainly defies the civics-textbook explanation of how a bill becomes a law.”
In fact, the bill defies all logic. Bush’s original request came in at $4.9 billion, but it quickly ballooned as members of both parties loaded it with pork for their districts. Ultimately, virtually everyone had a goody or 10 in the bill, and it won overwhelming approval: passing the House on a 381-40 vote and the Senate by an 81-12 margin.
Despite the lopsided support for the bill, Bush made a bold move in vetoing it. “Americans sent us to Washington to achieve results and be good stewards of their hard-earned taxpayer dollars,” Bush said in a statement Friday. “This bill violates that fundamental commitment.”
In addition to citing the bill’s $23 billion price tag, Bush criticized it for authorizing more than 900 projects and programs which, he said, would exacerbate the enormous backlog of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ construction projects. The White House said the bill would wind up costing taxpayers an additional $38 billion.
It really comes to no surprise that politicians act like politicians, irrespective of what letter they hang after their name. But it is sad that the taxpayers can’t count on anyone to champion their cause.
OpenMarket.org is the staff blog of the 




2 Responses to “GOP Big Spenders, But I Repeat Myself”
Posted by: Bluey Blog | RobertBluey.com » Bush Picks a Fight Over Pork - 11/06/2007
[...] — Nov. 6, 3:32 p.m.: Doug Bandow writes about this on OpenMarket.org. Posted at 10:42 AM in Capitol Hill, Clippings [...]
Posted by: F. Elaine Seelhorst - 11/09/2007
I am disgusted and very angry about all the “pork” added to appropriations bills. “Pork” is theift as well as bribery. I have begun to write representatives to stop their porky habits and give back all earmarks from 2005,2006,2007 and 2008 and repair our bridges. and give back the money they have stolen from Medicare, Fed.Transportation fund and Social Security.
Leave a Reply of Your Own