<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Turkeys on the Hill&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/21/turkeys-on-the-hill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/21/turkeys-on-the-hill/</link>
	<description>The Competitive Enterprise Institute Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fran Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/21/turkeys-on-the-hill/#comment-39744</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/21/turkeys-on-the-hill/#comment-39744</guid>
		<description>Gary--
Take a closer look at CEI's positions on these issues www.cei.org and I think you'll find that our positions would help protect consumers, taxpayers, and citizens.

Check out who's likely to benefit from the 2007 Farm Bill that I list as "first turkey."  The average income of farmers is projected to be over $86,000 this year, and major subsidies -- 24% -- go to just 1% of wealthy farmers. Even the USDA is saying that the bills aren't fair to taxpayers.

The energy bills would raise the cost of energy for consumers -- for transportation mobility and for fuel.  Plus people would be forced into smaller cars, which are less safe than larger cars and result in much higher death and injuries in accidents.

In relation to LOST -- I and other people don't want an international agency to have jurisdiction over the oceans and the waterways that flow into them.  

CPSC, in many cases, may actually diminish consumer safety.  By raising the costs of many consumer products, consumers may substitute other less safe products.  (For example, how much good does a "perfectly safe" ladder do if people can't afford it and put a chair on a table to replace a light bulb?)

Legislation addressing the subprime issue would make credit much more expensive and difficult to access, with the lower-income but still credit-worthy bearing the brunt of restrictions.

Think all of these positions would help the middle-class, and indeed the poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary&#8211;<br />
Take a closer look at CEI&#8217;s positions on these issues <a href="http://www.cei.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.cei.org</a> and I think you&#8217;ll find that our positions would help protect consumers, taxpayers, and citizens.</p>
<p>Check out who&#8217;s likely to benefit from the 2007 Farm Bill that I list as &#8220;first turkey.&#8221;  The average income of farmers is projected to be over $86,000 this year, and major subsidies &#8212; 24% &#8212; go to just 1% of wealthy farmers. Even the USDA is saying that the bills aren&#8217;t fair to taxpayers.</p>
<p>The energy bills would raise the cost of energy for consumers &#8212; for transportation mobility and for fuel.  Plus people would be forced into smaller cars, which are less safe than larger cars and result in much higher death and injuries in accidents.</p>
<p>In relation to LOST &#8212; I and other people don&#8217;t want an international agency to have jurisdiction over the oceans and the waterways that flow into them.  </p>
<p>CPSC, in many cases, may actually diminish consumer safety.  By raising the costs of many consumer products, consumers may substitute other less safe products.  (For example, how much good does a &#8220;perfectly safe&#8221; ladder do if people can&#8217;t afford it and put a chair on a table to replace a light bulb?)</p>
<p>Legislation addressing the subprime issue would make credit much more expensive and difficult to access, with the lower-income but still credit-worthy bearing the brunt of restrictions.</p>
<p>Think all of these positions would help the middle-class, and indeed the poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/21/turkeys-on-the-hill/#comment-39712</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 01:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/21/turkeys-on-the-hill/#comment-39712</guid>
		<description>Sounds like someone has stock options in American reality, agribussiness, Chinese imports, and Middle East oil. Just cash those in at this moment and sit back and let the American economy revive the middle class and not the 1%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like someone has stock options in American reality, agribussiness, Chinese imports, and Middle East oil. Just cash those in at this moment and sit back and let the American economy revive the middle class and not the 1%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
