<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hilariously Hypocritical Claim of Judicial Activism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/</link>
	<description>The Competitive Enterprise Institute Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Telecom Immunity Perfectly Constitutional &#124; OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-63229</link>
		<dc:creator>Telecom Immunity Perfectly Constitutional &#124; OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-63229</guid>
		<description>[...] no justice doubted that Congress could have made the 1991 Act retroactive if it so chose).  The landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act retroactively altered the law, immunizing civil-rights sit-in demonstrators from prosecution under longstanding state [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no justice doubted that Congress could have made the 1991 Act retroactive if it so chose).  The landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act retroactively altered the law, immunizing civil-rights sit-in demonstrators from prosecution under longstanding state [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court Strikes Down Washington Gun Ban &#124; OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-54355</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court Strikes Down Washington Gun Ban &#124; OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-54355</guid>
		<description>[...] likewise declared the D.C. gun ban unconstitutional.   Much of the criticism of that ruling was hypocritical, as I earlier explained.  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] likewise declared the D.C. gun ban unconstitutional.   Much of the criticism of that ruling was hypocritical, as I earlier explained.  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court Seems to Reject &#8220;Collective Rights&#8221; Limit on 2nd Amendment &#124; OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-46528</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court Seems to Reject &#8220;Collective Rights&#8221; Limit on 2nd Amendment &#124; OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-46528</guid>
		<description>[...] individual right, and why the lower court decision striking down Washington, D.C.&#8217;s gun ban was not judicial activism.  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] individual right, and why the lower court decision striking down Washington, D.C.&#8217;s gun ban was not judicial activism.  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gun Ban Challenged in Supreme Court Brief &#124; OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-44358</link>
		<dc:creator>Gun Ban Challenged in Supreme Court Brief &#124; OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-44358</guid>
		<description>[...] why the lower court ruling striking down the ban did not constitute &#8220;judicial activism&#8221; here and here.  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why the lower court ruling striking down the ban did not constitute &#8220;judicial activism&#8221; here and here.  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bye Bye to Unconstitutional Gun Lawsuit &#124; OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-41434</link>
		<dc:creator>Bye Bye to Unconstitutional Gun Lawsuit &#124; OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openmarket.org/2007/11/30/hilariously-hypocritical-claim-of-judicial-activism/#comment-41434</guid>
		<description>[...] the law is very dumb. Congress does this all the time. For example, the 1964 Civil Rights Act abated criminal convictions that had already occurred, retroactively turning certain forms of non-violent civil disobedience [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the law is very dumb. Congress does this all the time. For example, the 1964 Civil Rights Act abated criminal convictions that had already occurred, retroactively turning certain forms of non-violent civil disobedience [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
