Categorized | Legal

Class-Action Abuses Highlighted

In Saturday’s Washington Post, I have a letter discussing class-action lawsuit abuses.  It discusses how class-action lawsuit “settlements intended to benefit consumers get paid instead to groups that lobby for affirmative action, hate-crimes laws, undocumented immigrants, and public funding for abortions.”  When lawyers bring lawsuits in the name of consumers, the money they recover should go to consumers, not to promote their lawyers’ ideologies.



This Post has 5 Responses


Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] (Class action money ends up being diverted to political causes irrelevant to most consumers, like lobbying for affirmative action).   We wrote earlier about Barney Frank’s terrible mortgage bailout bill and how it would [...]

  2. [...] vetoes it.  I earlier wrote in the Washington Post about how class-action lawsuit “settlements intended to benefit consumers get paid instead to groups that lobby for affirmative acti….”  Some of these same groups are slated to receive taxpayer money under earmarks in federal [...]

  3. [...] vetoes it.  I earlier wrote in the Washington Post about how class-action lawsuit “settlements intended to benefit consumers get paid instead to groups that lobby for affirmative acti….”  Some of these same groups are slated to receive taxpayer money under earmarks in federal [...]

  4. [...] vetoes it.  I earlier wrote in the Washington Post about how class-action lawsuit “settlements intended to benefit consumers get paid instead to groups that lobby for affirmative acti….”  Some of these same groups are slated to receive taxpayer money under earmarks in federal [...]

  5. [...] of taxpayers and consumers. As I noted in the Washington Post, class-action lawsuit proceeds are routinely diverted to left-wing groups by liberal state judges under doctrines such as cy pres and “fluid recovery.” « Gold Is Not the Enemy [...]

  • Popular
  • Most Comments
  • Most Emails