End Ethanol Tariffs

by Hans Bader on May 25, 2008 · 2 comments

The federal government massively subsidizes corn-based ethanol production, even though it consumes as much energy as it generates, thus doing nothing to cut greenhouse gas emissions.  Yet the federal government imposes a tariff on imported ethanol that prevents costly ethanol mandates from being satisfied by less wasteful forms of ethanol production overseas.  In today’s Washington Post, Paul O’Connell criticizes the “U.S. tariff of 54 cents a gallon” that keeps imported sugar ethanol, which has a better “energy savings ratio” than corn ethanol, out of the U.S.   Environmental advocates like New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg have long made the same point, noting that ”corn ethanol does not yield more energy than it takes to produce, transport and use it,” unlike ethanol from some other sources, and that turning an essential food product like corn into fuel “will cause in increase in global food prices and lead to starvation deaths worldwide.”  Indeed, ethanol subsidies have already caused hunger, starvation, riots, and political unrest around the world, as well as considerable damage to the environment, such as soil erosion and deforestation.

Allen May 25, 2008 at 6:56 pm

I don't know if this is still is the case but, IIRC, the American Lung Assoc. (or some group like that) used to oppose ethanol because it essentially lowered CO2 pollution in exchange for NO2 which has it's own set of dangers.

Surelock Homes May 25, 2008 at 9:21 pm

What a wonderful congress we have elected.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: