Bailout Pushes Affirmative Action After “Diverse” Bank Collapses

Washington Mutual went under this week in the nation’s biggest bank failure ever.  But not before putting out a final press release touting its devotion to affirmative action and “diversity,” and the awards it received from Hispanic and gay-rights groups, such as being placed on an “annual Diversity Elite list” for its race-conscious efforts in recruiting, lending, and donations to Hispanic advocacy groups.

Maybe it would still be in business if it had paid as much attention to prudent lending practices as it paid to the race of its employees and customers. 

The government is obsessed with race, too.  It spent years promoting risky sub-prime mortgages through affordable housing mandates imposed in the name of “racial justice” and “diversity.”  And it punished lenders who refused to make risky loans through the Community Reinvestment Act and other laws.  Those mandates helped spawn the mortgage crisis.  Yet now, Congressional leaders are including affirmative action in the $700 billion bailout of America’s financial system.

At the behest of Congresswoman Maxine Waters, who justified the Los Angeles race-riots (which destroyed countless Korean-American businesses) as an “uprising” by the “oppressed,” Congress is adding affirmative action provisions to the bailout bill.  (Waters opposed reform of the fraud-ridden government-sponsored mortgage giant Fannie Mae, which helped trigger the financial crisis, calling its corrupt CEO Franklin Raines “outstanding”).

The proposed $700 billion bailout of the banking system has been set forth only in very broad terms, and vast discretion has been left in the hands of the Treasury Department to buy bad loans at a high or low price, with few checks and balances.  Congress could not be bothered to place any meaningful standards on this discretion.  But there is one exception: an affirmative action mandate! 

Even in the middle of what they claim is a national emergency, liberal Congressional leaders have included in their bailout bill an order to the Treasury Department to promote affirmative action in contracts related to the bailout to the “maximum extent practicable,” even in emergency situations when the Federal Acquisition Regulation must be suspended (see pp. 23 & 58 of the draft bill incorporating their deal with the Bush Administration).  If the world were about to end, liberal Congressmen would still be busy drafting affirmative action proposals.



This Post has 3 Responses


Comments

  1. Nancyf says:

    Funny to me but a whole lot of these businesses including Ford Motor Co. supports the illegal alien invasion. I'm beginning to wonder if Mexico had a lot more to do with this than we know. You know we bailed them out of their stock market disaster a few years ago….

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. [...] Michelle Malkin has an excellent post explaining the many ways that the bailout shafts taxpayers, and endangers the long run health of the economy.  She notes that Section 109 of the bill includes debt forgiveness, requiring the Treasury Department to consent to “reasonable requests” not only “for mortgage term extensions” and “rate reductions” but also “principal write-downs.”  Similarly costly give-aways are authorized in Sections 110 and 124 of the bill.  Section 107 of the bill mandates affirmative-action in contracting, through cumbersome requirements we earlier discussed. [...]

  2. [...] Congressional leaders turned a deaf ear to his pleas for reform, blocking reform legislation and claiming that the leadership of the fraud-ridden Fannie Mae was “outstanding,” while Fannie Mae was busy engaged in accounting fraud to enrich its managers (who remain [...]

  • Popular
  • Most Comments
  • Most Emails