More Criticism for Unconstitutional Auto Bailout

by Hans Bader on December 22, 2008 · 5 comments

in Bailout Watch, Economy, Features, Legal, Politics as Usual

Andrew Sullivan and George Will have joined Clinton Administration Labor Secretary Robert Reich, the Heritage Foundation and other commentators in concluding that the Bush Administration’s unilateral automaker bailout is unconstitutional. I earlier argued that the bailout is illegal or unconstitutional. Iain Murray explained how an automaker bailout in Britain failed miserably, since it (like Bush’s auto bailout) failed to make painful but necessary reforms needed for the auto industry to survive.

Even John McCain, who wanted the government to bail out banks by buying up all the bad loans in America, recognizes that Bush’s auto bailout will cost taxpayers “tens of billions of dollars” while failing to require reforms needed to ensure the “long-term viability” of the Detroit automakers, like cutting the $70 per hour compensation of their autoworkers.

{ 2 comments }

Vickie Pynchon December 22, 2008 at 6:10 am

The $70/hr is the COST to the companies of their workers, including long term investments for pensions. It does not represent the WAGES of the employees. Just keeping the record straight.

Dr. Edwin Weaver December 23, 2008 at 2:49 pm

You Blew It on the Auto Maker’s BailoutBy Dr. Edwin Weaver <a href="http://www.uniqueleaders.orghttp://www.uniqueleaders.org<br /> <a href="http://www.we-develop-leaders.comhttp://www.we-develop-leaders.com<br />December 2008Well, President Bush has made the Auto Maker’s Bailout just about a done deal and he blew it! Tossing them money, even with a supposed ‘Car Czar’ over them, won’t help.The auto workers will still be unemployed and the other industries connected to the auto industry will suffer and need to cut labor costs also. Once the Auto Makers have the money they will still cut US worker because they are the highest paid employees they have. The Auto Makers will still close US plants because they are the most costly to operate. After they are done destroying the economy, they will pocket the profits.There was another option which was not used; an option which would have kept Americans working, an option which would have helped improve the economy, an option which would have lessened the length of the recession/depression. Judging the decisions which have been made, we will go into a depression and a deep one. THE OTHER OPTIONYes, we should bailout the economy, just to save the American people. However the way that the bailout is processed and the terms under which the money is given are the key to success. The first thing that should have been done was an agreement by AUW to make concessions. What good does the contract do if you are unemployed and may never return to work? It shows the short sightedness of AUW.AUW makes concessions to keep the people employed, though they will lose some of the pay and perhaps some of their benefits, they will have a pay check every week. Something is better than nothing. Let’s look at the alternatives. If the AUW does not make concessions, the workers will lose their jobs. If the Auto companies go under all the salary increases the AUW have achieved and all the benefits they have garnered will be lost forever. Does it make sense to fight?Make the concessions and if and when the auto companies recover, at that point get the concessions reversed. This would ensure the livelihood of the workers and their families. Next on the agenda is the agreement with the Auto Makers so that no US plants close down. No US workers get axed. This may sound a bit protectionist, but if America does not protect America who will? This will also keep another half million employees OFF the unemployment rolls.The Auto Makers must cut costs. Part of that will be cutting the salaries and benefits of their top executives who dropped the ball by allowing the industry get into this appalling condition. If the workers are going to make concession, the top must make them also and since it was their decision which caused the problems they will make a hefty cut. They take an indefinite salary cut or take the door, which ever they choose. If they hit the unemployment rolls it won’t make a dent in the budget.They will not use any of the bailout money for themselves in any way, shape or form, like the Wall Street executives have been doing. See the article – AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs by FRANK BASS and RITA BEAMISH, Associated Press Writers Sun Dec 21, 6:33 pm ET. With the right regulators supervising the money and the cuts in costs, the industry should be able to make a come back. Between the concessions by AUW and keeping the employees working the federal government will have one headache out of the way, though they will still have to monitor the operation until the auto companies are sound again. At least there will not be thousands upon thousands of auto workers without jobs, not to mention the employees at other companies linked to the industry. It also keeps income taxes coming in to help pay for the other rescue plans. Next stop the housing industry. Obama’s plan to reconstruct the US starts with the reconstruction of the highways and buildings. Why here? The housing industry was hit first. The people who were working for the construction industry have used up their unemployment benefits and are getting hungry. They need to be the first put back to work. Since we will not swell the unemployment ranks with auto workers it will take some of the burden off the federal government. The country will start to have the infrastructure repaired and modernized and the unemployment ranks will decrease. This will supply the needed moral boost for the people of the country and start the country back on the road to recovery. With unemployment ranks decreasing the media will report an improvement. After two or three months of these reports the confidence will return to the population. With the people from the construction industry working again, after about three to four months they will have paid off some of their debts and start spending. The media reports of lower unemployment and coupled with increased spending will energize the rest of the country to renew their efforts. within one year the recession will be a thing of the past and the country will benefit from a modernized infrastructure and the confidence of their citizen. It is not quite that simple, but this is a brief overview of how to save the country from ruin; a ruin which our leaders keep compounding. At times it almost seems that they want the country to sink deeper or are they that inept and short sighted that they can not see the truth? Leadership is a key ingredient in times of turmoil and hopefully our new President will not make the same mistakes as our last one.

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 3 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: