No matter what the weather does the Greenpeace spokesperson will attempt to use it to support his perspective. If it gets warmer their angle is proved. If it gets colder their angle is proved. I don't get it.
Even if we were to grant the Greenpeace/Gore camp that global warming is happening the question then becomes what's the best way to address that? Through one-size-fits-all top-down government mandates or spontaneous bottom-up solutions from entrepreneurs?
{ 1 comment }
No matter what the weather does the Greenpeace spokesperson will attempt to use it to support his perspective. If it gets warmer their angle is proved. If it gets colder their angle is proved. I don't get it.
Even if we were to grant the Greenpeace/Gore camp that global warming is happening the question then becomes what's the best way to address that? Through one-size-fits-all top-down government mandates or spontaneous bottom-up solutions from entrepreneurs?
For more on this, check out the Earth Liberation! overview on Bureaucrash Social:
http://social.bureaucrash.com/page/page/show?id=2…
Comments on this entry are closed.