Obama, Waxman to Square Off on Free Speech

by Cord Blomquist on February 18, 2009 · 5 comments

in Features, Zeitgeist

From FoxNews.com:

“As the president stated during the campaign, he does not believe the Fairness Doctrine should be reinstated,” White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said.

If this is indeed the Obama administration’s official stance, the news couldn’t have come at a better time.  Just last week FCC officials met with Rep. Henry Waxman’s staff to discuss resurrecting the Fairness Doctrine under a new name.  Waxman, the head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, has also been looking into “fairness” issues on the Internet—creating an expanded, Fairness Doctrine 2.0.

The American Spectator reported on this reanimation of the long-dead doctrine and brought us this great quote from a Waxman staffer:

“It’s all about diversity in media,” says a House Energy staffer, familiar with the meetings. “Does one radio station or one station group control four of the five most powerful outlets in one community? Do four stations in one region carry Rush Limbaugh, and nothing else during the same time slot? Does one heavily trafficked Internet site present one side of an issue and not link to sites that present alternative views? These are some of the questions the chairman is thinking about right now, and we are going to have an FCC that will finally have the people in place to answer them.”

It doesn’t seem that Waxman’s real concern is having an FCC that can answer questions, but an FCC that will ignore its obligation to uphold the Constitution and sacrifice our freedom of speech on the alter of “fairness.”

Of course, none of this has anything to do with fairness, but has everything to do with politicians controlling what we can say, write, or otherwise express.

If Congress is somehow able to dupe the American people into accepting such speech restrictions—and President Obama doesn’t block a Fairness Doctrine 2.0—we can look forward to websites being patrolled by federal fairness cops, radio stations being staffed by stop-watch-toting FCC agents, and a presidential appointee sitting on the editorial board of every newspaper and magazine that still chooses to publish.

Let’s hope the President takes his oath seriously and defends the Constitution.  Our basic freedom to speak our mind—the most fundamental of all freedoms—may rely on Mr. Obama’s resolve.

{ 5 comments }

Ray Orbach February 18, 2009 at 4:54 pm

Maybe we should send the President a copy of "1984" just as a reminder.

Scott February 19, 2009 at 5:45 am

Cord, well said, but, I'm having a hard time finding a link on this page to a story that entirely contradicts what you just said. Maybe you could help me out with that?? Its only fair!

Veer Right February 22, 2009 at 4:57 am

I don't believe Obama for a second. George Soros and the American Progress Institute tell him what to do. Obama is at his core a Marxist trained in Saul Alinsky style. He will institute localism which is the Fairness Doctrine on steroids. He already had the Clinton welfare reforms repealed and health care will be rationed in the stimulus bill. These were put in during the middle of the night and suppressed by the media. Our free speech will be limited Marxist style. He said he was for SDI to the leader of Poland and told Russia SDI was negotiable. He lies to world leaders. Come on he is lying to us.

Paul February 25, 2009 at 3:49 am

How in the world are people believing in this crap? Did they stop teaching the constitution in school or something? Though with all that free speech crap in there I'm surprised its not banned yet. Stop using the excuse "This is how I interpret it" or "With all this new technology things need to change", why don't instead parents just start acting like real, caring parents and teach their kids to look at both sides of the story before choosing a side. Freedom, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness; you want all those things right? It comes with price, many of our countrymen had died over and over again to protect this and your going to let fear disrespect what they gave their lives for? The people that founded this country would be ashamed of us now. I am ashamed of us. Grow some cajones and stop using the government as a cop out because we failed as a country. Yes. WE. This is our country, not Obama's, not Bush's, and if these people really believe in our constitution; the patriot act or this new "FISA" bill would not exist. I will admit having Obama as president is proof that america won it's battle on racism. So drop it. Move On. Racism will always exist as look as there are groups that try to fight it. Stop living in fear people, fear did not drive our country to be the powerhouse it is today, but sticking to the constitution, making sure our civil liberties are always upheld. And making sure people that violate our constitution pay for it.

bruce March 11, 2009 at 10:28 am

they will have to shoot me to shut me up and i shoot back.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: