Tag Archive | "Chip Knappenberger"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Is 350 the New 450?

In today’s New York Times, Lauren Morello of ClimateWire asks, “Is 350 [parts per million] the New 450 [ppm] When It Comes to Capping Carbon Emissions?”

The answer is yes, suggests Morello, a reporter with a keen eye for the shifting fashions of climate chic.

The older viewpoint was that if the world cuts back its CO2 emissions at least 50% by 2050, with industrial countries cutting their emissions by 80% or more, we could stabilize CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, and that, in turn, would…

Read the full story

Posted in Global WarmingComments (3)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Will climate change cause water wars? Will Waxman-Markey enhance U.S. energy security? No and No.

Last week, on the free-market energy blog MasterResource.Org, I posted a two-part column on climate change and national security. In a nutshell, I argued that global warming is likely not an important geopolitical or military “threat multiplier,” and that the national security risks of climate change policies likely outweigh those of climate change itself.

One of the great things about “publishing” on the Internet is that readers can quickly and easily share other insights and information the author had not considered.

Climate scientist and fellow blogger Chip Knappenberger called my…

Read the full story

Posted in Energy, Ethanol, Global WarmingComments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

So, Mr. Waxman, how much global warming will your bill avert?

So, Mr. Waxman, how much global warming will your bill avert?

The Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade (energy tax) bill aims to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions 20% below 2005 levels by 2020, 42% below by 2030, and 83% below by 2050. The cumulative cost in reduced GDP would likely total trillions of dollars. How much bang would we get for the buck?

Today, on Masterresource.org, climate scientist Chip Knappenberger shows by the numbers that the Waxman-Markey bill “will have virtually no impact on the future course of the earth’s climate.”

To calculate the climatic effects of the bill,…

Read the full story

Posted in Features, Global WarmingComments (2)

  • Popular
  • Most Comments
  • Most Emails