Tag Archive | "Markey"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fisking Paul Krugman

In today’s New York Times, Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman preens about intellectual dishonesty while presenting the most intellectually dishonest case about the cost of climate change policies I have seen this side of Joe Romm.  It moved me to do something I have not done for some time, and Fisk the entire article.  Krugman’s words are in italics.

So, have you enjoyed the debate over health care reform? Have you been impressed by the civility of the discussion and the intellectual honesty…

Read the full story

Posted in Economy, Energy, Environment, Global Warming, SanctimonyComments (5)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Firing Blanks on FOIA Part II

In his update to his post, Declan McCullagh notes an objection by the Center for American Progress:

The fourth objection is the most compelling. The Center for American Progress writes: “The potential benefits of clean energy legislation far outweigh the modest costs.” That’s a reasonable cost vs. benefit calculation, and it includes the claim that even with the extra taxes, cap and trade is so vital to America, it’s still worth it.

That’s the right approach to take: it would be a…

Read the full story

Posted in Economy, Energy, Environment, Global Warming, International, RegulationComments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

New Paper Shows Staggering Cost to Americans of Waxman-Markey

New Paper Shows Staggering Cost to Americans of Waxman-Markey

There’s a new cost:benefit study from New York University Law School’s Institute for Public Integrity that, its authors claim, shows that, “From almost any perspective and under almost any assumption, H.R. 2454 [Waxman-Markey] is a good investment for the United States to make in our own economic future and in the future of the planet.”  A good investment for the US? Really?

The authors recognize that the benefits they find are global, while the costs are located in the US.  So let’s…

Read the full story

Posted in Economy, Environment, Global Warming, International, Politics as UsualComments (2)

Tags: , , , , , ,

A Bill of Rights to enshrine Net Neutrality?

After changing its mind about throttling Bittorrent traffic last month, Comcast has pulled a 180° on network neutrality. Last week, Comcast announced plans to publish a consumers’ “bill of rights and responsibilities,” detailing what subscribers should expect from their ISP and laying out network management best practices.

Naturally, the “Save the Internet” crowd isn’t satisfied with Comcast’s declaration. Being protocol-agnostic wasn’t enough for them, and neither is a consumer bill of rights. Customers will only be safe from evil ISPs, they say, with aggressive neutrality mandates like…

Read the full story

Posted in Tech & TelecomComments (5)

  • Popular
  • Most Comments
  • Most Emails