redistribution

Egalitarians are often upset that technological breakthroughs, whether new cancer drugs or computers, are first only available to the wealthy while the masses must wait until they’re more affordable. 

This concern neglects the fact that new products are not only costly but risky.  Moreover, many experimental drugs and devices initially appear hopeful but fall flat in practice.  New technologies often entail higher than expected maintenance costs or simply prove too erratic for success.  In a market economy, those risks are (thankfully) borne by the wealthy.  They can afford the high cost and low quality associated with breakthrough products.  Central heating and air conditioners; radios, televisions, and DVD players; GPS, anti-lock brakes, and now automatic braking systems; even experimental medical procedures -all initially costly and “clunky” products. 

By supporting the initial market, wealthy consumers encourage producers to invest in product enhancements and production efficiencies that – if the product proves useful – make the breakthrough available to all.  The rich buy expensive, complex and low quality products – and, in so doing, make it possible for us to obtain a simpler, more affordable, high-quality product.

In experimental biology, we use white mice to test the unknown.  In capitalism, the rich voluntarily accept this role.  Many are upset over income inequalities, but if one reflects, we need these “white mice.”  What would life be like without them!

This morning I read with interest – and amazement – the above headline.  Does our president live in the same world that I inhabit?  He’s worried about America’s increasing indebtedness and is pushing for a massive expansion of health entitlements (aka wealth redistribution programs) and the cap-and-tax global warming initiatives (aka wealth redistribution programs) and a host of other other wealth-destroying regulatory programs. Yet, he’s worried about America’s growing debt?

Our political system is only now perhaps emerging from a foolish policy of lowering credit standards to encourage universal home ownership.  We’re now about to lower credit standards for health and energy investments.  In effect, the problems of subprime mortgages are now being universalized.  But, as in the subprime case, we’re assured that these moves will actually lower the national debt! Does reality have any relevancy?