Robert Mugabe

Chavez (and Marx) a hit at Copenhagen

by Fran Smith on December 17, 2009 · 1 comment

in Environment, Global Warming, Personal Liberty

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez couldn’t resist another opportunity to bash capitalism — and the COP15 Copenhagen Conference on global warming gave him a perfect setup. Protesters against globalization, capitalism, energy use, and other aspects of modern life thronged in the streets, while in the conference center, leaders from rich nations that want to “level the playing field” for CO2 emissions and poor countries looking for massive handouts gave Chavez a warm response.

In his harangue posted on YouTube, Chavez hit the “group of countries who think they’re better than us” and that provide a “world imperial dictatorship.” He, of course, made reference and deference to his hero Karl Marx:

There’s a ghost lurking…and Karl Marx said…a ghost running through the streets of Copenhagen.  And I think that ghost is silent, somewhere in this room…amongst us…coming thru the corridors and underneath.  And that ghost is a terrible ghost.  Nobody wants to name him or her…it’s capitalism.  Capitalism is that ghost.  (applause)

Chavez got a lot of applause here too. He tied capitalism to the degradation of the earth: “the destructive model of capitalism is eradicating life.”

President Robert Mugabe, credited with destroying the economy of his own country,  Zimbabwe, also railed against Western countries and capitalism:

“When these capitalist gods of carbon burp and belch their dangerous emissions, it’s we, the lesser mortals of the developing sphere who gasp and sink and eventually die.”

And this is the conference where “world leaders” are supposedly coming together to plan the world’s energy future?  It’s a scary thought.

Elephantine Mistake

by Iain Murray on January 9, 2009 · 1 comment

in Environment, International

In the 80s and 90s, Zimbabwean elephant management was a magnificent illustration of how property rights and markets combine to protect and even rescue endangered species.

Since Robert Mugabe’s government turned to racist demagoguery and violence to keep in power, the elephant has suffered tremendously as property rights and markets have been shattered. Today, it is reported that
elephants are being slaughtered for food by Mugabe’s army.

The elephant is probably one of the lesser reasons to work for the downfall of this vicious dictator, who has ruined the breadbasket of Africa. Yet if its role as a “charismatic megafauna” can help, I trust the green environmental groups will join me in calling for his overthrow and the restoration of the successful policies that allowed the elephant to thrive.

Thousands Die After Zimbabwe Dictator Nationalizes Water Systems

by Hans Bader on January 8, 2009

in Economy, Environment, International, Politics as Usual, Regulation

Thousands of people have died of cholera in Zimbabwe after the country’s left-wing dictator Robert Mugabe nationalized municipal water systems to seize their revenue, allowing them to fall into ruin in the process.

“The cholera epidemic has its origins in politics . . .Mugabe’s ZANU-PF regime nationalized municipal water supplies in 2006 after the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), led by Morgan Tsvangirai, controlled some 80 percent of seats nationwide following successes in municipal elections. Mugabe’s government seized the water authorities to deny the MDC revenue and to control the lucrative contracts for repair of the broken system. The result was mayhem: Graft and corruption further undermined repairs, water went untreated and raw sewage was pumped into [the capital city of] Harare’s main reservoir. Bulawayo, Zimbabwe’s second-largest city, was spared this fate. Mugabe’s regime had calculated that taking over the water authority there would drive residents to vote for the MDC. Tellingly, Bulawayo suffered no cholera deaths last week, while Harare’s case fatality rate for the same week was 19 percent, some 20 times higher than the 1 percent fatality rate the World Health Organization estimates for cholera when proper treatment is available.”

Filthy water isn’t the only cause of rampant death in Zimbabwe. Malnutrition is another. So is destruction of the country’s hospitals. “On Nov. 18, President Robert Mugabe’s police, wielding batons, attacked doctors, nurses and medical students from the teaching hospital.”

In 1979, Zimbabwe had a democratically-elected government. But then-president Jimmy Carter undermined it with sanctions, helping bring to power the bloody insurgent leader, Mugabe (who had received aid from North Korea). Carter was angry that the country’s white elite had been able to cede power peacefully to the new democratically-elected president, the black nationalist bishop Abel Muzorewa, rather than being violently overthrown by Mugabe, the black insurgent leader who had waged a guerrilla war against the regime dominated by that white elite. Carter’s UN Ambassador, Andrew Young, effusively praised Mugabe as “incorruptible” and claimed that the stoutly-democratic Muzorewa was a fascist.  Out of ideological blindness and political correctness, Carter effectively condemned thousands of people in Zimbabwe to death and misery. Aided by U.S. sanctions, Mugabe soon took over the country, jailing Bishop Muzorewa. His North Korean-trained security forces then killed perhaps 25,000 members of the minority Ndebele tribe, forcing torture victims to sing praises to Mugabe even as they were savagely tortured, and forcing people to torture their own family members, sometimes to death.

Mugabe has since turned Zimbabwe, once a prosperous breadbasket, into one of the world’s poorest and hungriest countries.  Dissidents’ wives and children are tortured and murdered, orphans are beaten, schools are turned into torture chambers, and aid agencies that once fed thousands of starving people have been kicked out of the country.

Liberal politicians have learned little since then about not meddling in other countries’ affairs. Obama went to Kenya in 2006 and supported the candidacy of a socialist rabble-rouser (a distant kinsman of Obama) who incited ethnic cleansing after the disputed election of December 2007, until the embattled incumbent president, a pro-western reformer, named him prime minister to end the bloodshed.

Jimmy Carter Disowns the Dictator Mugabe, His Frankenstein

by Hans Bader on December 14, 2008 · 2 comments

in International, Personal Liberty, Politics as Usual, Sanctimony

After years of criticizing supposedly “unilateral” American military intervention in places like Iraq (where the U.S. was actually acting in concert with other countries, like Britain), Jimmy Carter is now suggesting that military action may be necessary to depose the dictator of the African nation of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe.  Mugabe is blocking international assistance to his malnourished subjects, who are dying in droves in a cholera epidemic that Mugabe has concealed and claims does not exist.

Carter’s call to depose Mugabe is ironic, because as President, Carter paved the way for Mugabe’s blood-soaked dictatorship, which turned Zimbabwe, once a prosperous breadbasket, into one of the world’s poorest and hungriest countries.  Dissidents’ wives and children are tortured and murdered, orphans are beaten, schools are turned into torture chambers, aid agencies that once fed thousands of starving people were kicked out of the country, and a cholera epidemic rages across the country, where life expectancy has plunged from around 60 years to less than 40. 

When Zimbabwean voters overwhelmingly elected a racial-reconciliation government headed by the black bishop Abel Muzorewa in 1979, to replace the white-only regime that had governed the country, the U.S. Senate unanimously voted to recommend an end to international sanctions against the new government, which was starved of funds and facing a bloody guerilla war led by Marxists like Mugabe, who was supported by North Korea.  Carter ignored the vote, maintained sanctions against the new government, and supported Mugabe.  His U.N. Ambassador, Andrew Young, effusively praised Mugabe, who had killed people simply for voting, saying that the only thing that bothered him about Mugabe was that he was “so damn incorruptible.” 

Aided by U.S. sanctions, Mugabe soon took over the country, jailing Bishop Muzorewa.  His North Korean-trained security forces then killed perhaps 25,000 members of the minority Ndebele tribe, forcing torture victims to sing praises to Mugabe even as they were savagely tortured, and forcing people to torture their own family members, sometimes to death.  Guilty white liberals, who had lionized Mugabe as a saintly opponent of racism and representative of black Zimbabweans, did not know what to make of this, and either remained silent, or kept praising him.  Mugabe’s government received billions of dollars in aid, which finally stopped after Mugabe destroyed his country’s economy by seizing the  country’s white-owned commercial farms and giving them to his incompetent political cronies.  More recently, Mugabe so mismanaged his country’s crumbling economy and infrastructure that an easily-preventable cholera epidemic broke out, killing thousands. 

During his presidency, Carter was blind to Mugabe’s faults because he saw Mugabe through a prism of racial guilt, seeing a Third-World post-colonial conflict as a reenactment of the U.S. civil-rights movement. 

President-elect Obama made a mistake of the same kind when he went to Kenya in 2006 to campaign for the unscrupulous socialist Raila Odinga against the pro-Western, democratically-elected government of President Mwai Kibaki.  Odinga, a Luo tribesman, fanned the flames of ethnic hatred by milking the resentment of many of Kenya’s tribes against President Kibaki’s prosperous Kikuyu tribe.   (The subsequent election, which Kibaki was declared to have won after likely election fraud, led to a violent ethnic conflict, and ethnic cleansing by Odinga supporters, that ended only when Kibaki appointed Odinga Prime Minister and ceded to him much of his presidential powers). 

Obama apparently saw his meddling in the politics of another country as righting past racial wrongs, since Kibaki’s Kikuyu have historically fared better than Odinga’s economically-backward Luo tribe, which counted Obama’s father as a member.  But Kenya is not America during the civil-rights movement, and it was foolhardy for Obama to meddle in African politics, just as it was foolhardy for Carter to do so three decades earlier in Zimbabawe.  Fortunately, the man Obama supported (Odinga) does not appear to be as evil as the man Carter supported (Mugabe).