systemic risks

…is the title of a useful contribution to the discussion from the International Policy Network in London and the Lion Rock Institute in Hong Kong. Their recommendations for finding a way out of the financial mess are worth attending to:

– Better mechanisms are needed to manage the failure of large financial institutions, some of which may now be both too big to fail and also too big to rescue.
– Open ended guarantees to depositors and other counterparties are expensive and unsustainable in the longer term.
– The rights and hierarchy of investors across the capital structure should be clear and honoured — not subject to arbitrary alteration by government.
– Closer attention to the rights of collateral providers and custodians in the case of failures can limit systemic risks.
– Hedge fund failures have not created systemic risks in this crisis and they should not be a target of policy action.
– Ad-hoc bailouts should be avoided, since they create ever expanding demands for further intervention.
– Much more thought needs to be given to the unintended consequences of over strict capital rules, rating agency privileges and rating based limits on pension investments.

As the authors say, “free markets thrive on creative destruction” and these recommendations would help in that respect. In fact, when it comes to free markets, creative destruction isn’t a bug. It’s a feature!

While conservatives are angry about a number of things at the moment, they should be at least as angry that the Congressional Democrats who helped stoke the mortgage crisis are getting away with blaming everyone else for it. Today, Senator Chris Dodd, the prime recipient of GSE lobbying funds and proud holder of a sweetheart mortgage from Countrywide, is holding hearings where the witnesses will blame everyone but Dodd, Barney Frank and their cronies. Republicans asked to invite witnesses but were barred from doing so. The Wall Street Journal has more:

In February 2004, while Republican colleagues warned of the systemic risks posed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Mr. Dodd pronounced the mortgage market “one of the great success stories of all time.” A year later, the Connecticut Democrat voted against a reform that would have limited the size of Fan and Fred’s mortgage portfolios…At today’s hearing, his mission is to weave a tale that somehow manages to avoid mentioning his own role in this debacle. That won’t be easy, but Mr. Dodd has shrewdly selected a series of witnesses who, like him, contributed to the mess, and have every incentive to point fingers elsewhere.

Read the whole thing for details of the ridiculous witnesses and a strong suggestion for who should be called. Meanwhile, in The Washington Post, Peter Schiff has a good outline of how government – and the actions of Bill Clinton – really did help cause this mess and is probably now making it worse:

Yes, many Wall Street leaders were irresponsible, and they should pay. But they were playing the distorted hand dealt them by government policies. Our leaders irrationally promoted home-buying, discouraged savings, and recklessly encouraged borrowing and lending, which together undermined our markets…By refusing to allow market forces to rein in excess spending, liquidate bad investments, replenish depleted savings, fund capital investment and help workers transition from the service sector to the manufacturing sector, government is resisting the cure while exacerbating the disease.

There’s actually a school of thought that this decade is paralleling the 1930s quite closely (see the Oct 7 edition of The Short View, about 2 minutes in) and that we’re in the thick of something that actually began in 2000 or so. Over in Britain, Gordon Brown has apparently decided that increased public spending is necessary. The 1930s all over again, indeed. We need to get angry about the wool Chris Dodd and co are pulling over our eyes.